Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket has priced the YES outcome—a Bologna victory on 24 May 2026—at 26%, implying roughly a 1-in-4 chance. The match sits in the final round of Serie A, a fixture that historically carries weight for both clubs depending on their seasonal trajectories. Inter Milan typically finishes in the upper half of the table, whilst Bologna has oscillated between mid-table consolidation and European qualification attempts in recent seasons. The conditional token structure on Polygon means traders holding YES tokens receive full USDC payout only if Bologna wins outright; draws and Inter victories settle at zero, making this a binary bet on the Rossoblu's performance.

Historical precedent suggests 26% reflects a reasonable underdog premium. Bologna's home record against top-six sides has been mixed; they've taken points off Inter in recent years but rarely as favourites. Inter's away form in May typically remains strong, though fixture congestion and European commitments in preceding weeks can affect squad rotation. The timing—final-day football—introduces unpredictability: both teams' objectives (title races, European spots, or avoiding relegation battles) will determine selection intensity.

Traders should monitor team news from mid-May onwards, particularly injury updates and any European fixture overlaps. Serie A's official fixture calendar and both clubs' European competition schedules will clarify whether either side rests players. Recent form in April and early May will be the sharpest indicator; a Bologna surge or Inter collapse would shift the 26% pricing materially. Settlement occurs immediately post-match on Polygon, with USDC redemption available within standard network confirmation times.

Methodology

We track Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.