Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Marco Cecchinato vs Andrea Pellegrino

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket is showing this Cecchinato v Pellegrino contract at 0% YES, which points to no live YES bids despite the match being the one that matters for settlement on Polygon in USDC through conditional tokens. That price is best read as a thin or inactive market rather than a view on the tennis itself, especially with the Roland Garros qualifying draw still unfolding and a result needed before the 28 May settlement window closes. If the match is played and a winner is declared, the contract should resolve to that player; if not, the market falls back to its tie or delay rules.

On comparable form, the market has a clear tennis baseline: Andrea Pellegrino has been listed as the stronger favourite by recent preview pricing, with Tennis Tonic putting him around 1.40 against Cecchinato at 2.82, and Scores24 recording Pellegrino winning their latest meeting 7:6, 6:7, 6:4. That makes a zero price on Polymarket look detached from the underlying matchup rather than from head-to-head logic. Cecchinato’s value case depends on qualifying form and any clay-court edge, but the last direct result favoured Pellegrino and the ATP head-to-head page is the relevant reference point for any prior meeting history.

The main catalysts are straightforward: final draw timing, court assignment, and any postponement that pushes the match beyond the seven-day threshold or leaves it unplayed. Tennis Tonic reported the fixture was scheduled for Thursday on Court 13, while SofaScore listed a 21 May start at 09:00 UTC, so traders need to watch for official scoreboards and event updates rather than preview pieces once play begins. If the match starts but does not finish, Polymarket’s contract mechanics become decisive, because the outcome will depend on whether an official winner is recorded or whether the fallback rules for interruption apply.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Marco Cecchinato vs Andrea Pellegrino on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.