Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Felix Gill vs Kyrian Jacquet

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket is effectively pricing Felix Gill to beat Kyrian Jacquet at 100% yes, which means there is no visible spread left in the USDC-settled, Polygon-based contract despite the exchange’s usual conditional-token structure. With the match listed for Roland Garros qualifying and the market set to resolve on who advances, that crowd price implies traders see the result as already functionally decided, or at least that any downside has been exhausted in the order book.

For a price this tight, the closest guide is not the headline event but how qualifying matches at majors tend to settle when one player is expected to progress and the draw has already been published. Kalshi’s exact-score market for the same fixture has also shown heavy skew towards straight-sets outcomes, while sportsbook pricing has Jacquet favoured in the broader match markets. That split matters: if the live tennis feed or tournament data later shows a walkover, retirement, or no contest, Polymarket’s resolution rules can still push the contract to 50-50 rather than a simple winner-takes-all outcome.

The main trader watchlist is operational rather than speculative: official Roland Garros schedule updates, start-time changes, and whether the match is actually played within the seven-day settlement window ending 29 May. Sofascore and Flashscore both listed the match for 22 May, but live events in qualifying can move quickly if weather, court scheduling, or a prior match overrun intervenes. If play begins but ends unfinished, the final advancement ruling will be what matters for settlement; if it is not played at all, the contract mechanics override the pre-match crowd view.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.